What the University of Arkansas controversy can teach us about archival permission practices

ua_logo_largePeter Hirtle’s article regarding an archive having a “permission to publish” policy makes many great points. Possibly the best one is that it could actually increase the chance that the library/archive is liable for copyright infringement.

The Arkansas case study demonstrates that archival “permission to publish” is a practice that is both poorly understood and which can be detrimental to the donor, the repository, and the researcher. Following this standard archival procedure, as the University of Arkansas suggests, is not “good business practice…[that] makes operations run smoothly.”  It is time for repositories to get out of the “permission to publish” game and leave permissions to the copyright owner.

Read the full article @ Library Law Blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *