Over the decades, a lot of really stupid management fads have come and gone, including:
Six Sigma, where employees wear different colored belts (like in karate) to show they’ve been trained in the methodology.
Stack Ranking, where employees are encouraged to rat each other out in order to secure their own advancement and budget.
Consensus Management, where all decisions must pass through multiple committees before being implemented.It need hardly be said that these fads were and are (at best) a waste of time and (at worst) a set of expensive distractions. But open plan offices are worse. Much worse. Why? Because they decrease rather than increase employee collaboration.
As my colleague Jessica Stillman pointed out last week, a new study from Harvard showed that when employees move from a traditional office to an open plan office, it doesn’t cause them to interact more socially or more frequently.
Instead, the opposite happens. They start using email and messaging with much greater frequency than before. In other words, even if collaboration were a great idea (it’s a questionable notion), open plan offices are the worst possible way to make it happen.
Previous studies of open plan offices have shown that they make people less productive, but most of those studies gave lip service to the notion that open plan offices would increase collaboration, thereby offsetting the damage.
The Harvard study, by contrast, undercuts the entire premise that justifies the fad. And that leaves companies with only one justification for moving to an open plan office: less floor space, and therefore a lower rent.
Read the full article @ Inc.
Photo: CC Paintzen
