Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button
Youtube button

Archive for » May 23rd, 2008«

But you’re *all* special

Lately a lot of articles and books about generational differences have come across my desk. Boomers, Gen X (me), Millennials. There are similarities, and not all the generalizations apply to everyone, but there are significant differences that you can’t avoid. My problem with the Millennials is their innate sense of entitlement which, in most cases, I place the blame squarely on their boomer parents. This sense of "we’re all special" and "we’re all winners" is just not realistic. Case in point:

I’ve got a high school graduation to go to on Saturday morning. Turns out that there’s going to be 11, yes eleven, valedictorians! ELEVEN!? I’m sorry, but doesn’t the very definition of this word make it a singular? Let’s check…

"the student usually having the highest rank in a graduating class who delivers the valedictory address at the commencement exercises"
Merriam-Webster.com

Yep, just what I thought. It’s not a plural within a single school. So, how do eleven students give a single valedictory address? The don’t. Er, well, they all do. In this case each of the eleven students is allowed to give a two minute speech. WTF? Yeah, a lot of wisdom from some very smart kids can be boiled down into what are in effect soundbytes. (As a co-worker described it: a Pecha Kucha graduation.) To make it worse, they were informed by the school that each talk had to be based around a movie and had to use quotes from the movie of choice to illustrate whatever they were trying to express. So much for trusting the smartest student in the class to make an appropriate or inappropriate speech as they see fit. Wouldn’t want to give them that amount of trust.

Now, I don’t know the exact reasons for having 11 valedictorians but I’m going to make an educated guess: we wouldn’t want to disappoint any of the 4.0 students. They’ve all earned it. Sorry, but ONE student has earned it, not eleven. If you’ve actually got a tie (statistically improbable that it’s an eleven-way tie, but not impossible) then use additional factors like attendance or extra curricular activities. Come on adults, show some backbone to your kids and pick a winner. The other ten will get over it.

Oh, and there’s going to be just one salutatorian. Just proving that earning either of these honors isn’t exclusive, just that you’re a member of a grade range.

Category: rant  4 Comments

Further proof that filters don’t work

Last week I was at the offices of Lincoln Public Schools to present on LibraryThing. During some free time in the lab I wanted to catch up with some online articles I’d been meaning to read. I fired up del.icio.us and started clicking on some recently bookmarked sites. One was titled 60 Photography Links You Can’t Live Without. Here’s what I was presented with:

No cameraporn.com for me

Turns out any site, in this case the blog "Camera Porn" is blocked as being porn. Check the link, it’s not porn in the traditional vein. Good to know that these sites are vetted by real live people… Not! I’m guessing science students won’t be allowed to look at Space Porn or Astronomy Porn either.

Small rural libraries and technology

Recently I was speaking with someone about a forthcoming open position which would be dealing with many small rural libraries. The person was saying that they had mentioned to a board member that would be hiring someone that they should be sure to look for someone more technology oriented/comfortable than the person leaving the position. The board member responded something to the effect of "sure, but we need someone who can focus on the needs of small rural libraries."

Do you see a disconnect here? This conversation to me implies that someone in the position of hiring the next library leader in that area believes that the "needs of small rural libraries" and technology are mutually exclusive. Well, they’re not. How about this for an idea: look to hire someone that understands the needs of small rural libraries and has a basic yet solid grasp of technology. Better yet, someone who can understand how technology can help small rural libraries. Just an idea.