IM stats

It seems that Aaron’s library was featured in Library Journal for having 400 IM-based reference sessions in the past seven months. Meg, on The Librarian in Black’s blog, played “devil’s advocate” and wondered if, after you do the math, what they did was worth the effort. My response to her would be to ask how many IM-based reference sessions did your library do? Besides those 400 sessions may not have happened in any other form so you can think of it as 400 new patrons. (Though that number gets smaller if you consider repeat users.) I believe that even just one new patron is worth the effort put into such a service from the library.

Posted in 1Tagged

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *