CAL2005: Making Complex and Ethical Decisions You and Your Library Can Live With


Mary Elizabeth Harper, Highlands Ranch Branch Manager, Douglas County Public Library District
(trustee workshop)

  • ALA Code of Ethics
    • Highest level of service to all users
      • Qualified staff
      • Collection
      • Hours of service
    • Appropriate
      • Defined at the local level
    • Usefully organized
      • Accessible
    • Resources
      • Books
      • Tape/cd
      • Video/dvd
      • databases
    • Equitable service policies
      • Non-discriminatory
      • Reasonable circ policies
    • Equitable access
      • Physical access to the building and materials
      • Hours
    • Accurate, unbiased responses
      • Ref librarian shouldn’t give their opinion
      • From a reliable source
    • & courteous responses to all request
      • obvious
  • Code was written as a guide
  • Five things decision ought to be
    • Variety of options
    • People are not the problem
    • Problem, not opinions
    • Objective criteria, not emotions
    • Criteria to determine effectiveness
  • What makes a decision effective?
  • Evaluating Effectiveness
    • From PLA
    • Effectiveness can be measures by three elements, each of which has a five level scale
      • Target Audience
      • Result produced
      • Audience response
  • SWOT analysis
    • Strengths
    • Weaknesses
    • Opportunities
    • Threats
  • Sacred Cow
    • In use by PLA since 2000
    • Look at what’s “always been done this way” & see what could be changed
    • Things for which you don’t know why its done that way
    • Ingrained habits
    • Good to do with a group of people that are working together
    • Used to resolve issues
    • Circulation staff (good area to use this method)
  • Needs Decision Tree
    • Her new favorite
    • Good tool for many types of decisions
    • 1st question: how well suited is the library to meeting this need
    • Go through the flowchart answering yes/no, well/not
    • Helps people identify things they cannot do
  • An attendee suggested maybe libraries should consider offering Internet access to homes. (Becoming an ISP in essence.) This was not well accepted by the others in the room, including myself.
  • At this point the discussion seriously degenerated into discussion on what services the library should or should not be offering, not a discussion on how to make decisions.
  • Start with the mission/vision statement of the library.
    • What is the library’s goal?
    • Does what you’re trying to decide, match that mission/vision?
  • Public librarians tend to live in the past
    • Patterns work, then the patterns change
    • i.e. computers & the Internet
  • Limited resources, how do you divvy up the resources?
    • Public libraries tend to just keep adding resources without taking others away as other public entities do
    • Determine what it is the community wants
    • What does the staff/facility/budget have the capacity to provide
    • Gather data, set priorities
    • Reallocate resources as needed
  • Your responsibility as a trustee is to make the best decision you can for the library/public you serve
  • Handout: quotations (relevant & humorous) regarding ethical decisions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *