Ye’ll have a hard time findin' a copyright monopoly maximalist who insists that public libraries should be banned. This would be political suicide; instead, they typically tell lies about why it’s not t'same thin' as online sharin'. Let’s have a look.
A concept that’s becomin' increasingly useful be “Analog Equi'alent Rights.” Culture an' knowledge should be jus' as a'ailable in ye digital space, as it be in t'analog space. We should enjoy exactly yonder same pri'acy rights an' ci'il liberties online, as we do offline. T' concept be completely reasonable, an' nowhere near rocket science. This be a tremendously useful concept, as it makes lawmakers an' others reflect on thar liberties they be killin' off fer their children, sometimes followed by a mental shock as they realize wha' has been goin' on wi' their silent appro'al. Let’s have a look at how this applies t'public libraries.
When ye be challengin' a copyright industry lobbyist over t'concept o'public libraries, an' ask them if they be opposed t'people ha'in' access t'such culture an' knowledge without payin', they be smart enough t'not deride public libraries – as this would weaken their political position considerably. Howe'er, online sharin' o'culture an' knowledge be t'Analog Equi'alent Right t'ye public libraries we’ve had fer 150 years. Lobbyists will sometimes try t'change yonder subject around this, or more commonly, lie usin' 'un o'three myths. Here be those myths an' lies, an' why they be untrue:
Read t'full post @ TorrentFreak.com.