<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OCLC and CC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://travelinlibrarian.info/2008/11/oclc-and-cc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://travelinlibrarian.info/2008/11/oclc-and-cc/</link>
	<description>&#34;You Two! We&#039;re at the end of the universe, eh. Right at the edge of knowledge itself. And you&#039;re busy... blogging!&#34; — The Doctor, Utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jrochkind</title>
		<link>http://travelinlibrarian.info/2008/11/oclc-and-cc/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>jrochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travelinlibrarian.info/wordpress/2008/11/oclc-and-cc.html#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>CC in particular is probably not applicable to cataloging records, because CC is only applicable to things that can be copyrighted, and &#039;data&#039; generally can not be, and cataloging records are _probably_ mostly data. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License is more applicable:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Although interestingly, the drafter&#039;s of the Open Data Commons stuff decided there was no practical way to have &quot;some rights reserved&quot; under the CC model, the only useful legal thing you could really do with data was put it out in the public domain as &#039;no rights reserved&#039;.  This is very related to the fact that in many jurisdictions including the US, data can&#039;t be copyrighted, although it can be controlled by other means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC in particular is probably not applicable to cataloging records, because CC is only applicable to things that can be copyrighted, and &#8216;data&#8217; generally can not be, and cataloging records are _probably_ mostly data. </p>
<p>The Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License is more applicable:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/</a></p>
<p>Although interestingly, the drafter&#8217;s of the Open Data Commons stuff decided there was no practical way to have &#8220;some rights reserved&#8221; under the CC model, the only useful legal thing you could really do with data was put it out in the public domain as &#8216;no rights reserved&#8217;.  This is very related to the fact that in many jurisdictions including the US, data can&#8217;t be copyrighted, although it can be controlled by other means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
